Cases 11 - 20 of 181
St. Rose v. Baltimore County Police Department
as 1:2023cv01206
Plaintiff:
Lloyd St. Rose
Defendant:
Baltimore County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
St. Rose v. Clifton T. Perkins Hospital
as 1:2023cv00916
Plaintiff:
Lloyd St. Rose
Defendant:
Clifton T. Perkins Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Abanda et al v. Wolteji et al
as 8:2023cv01070
Plaintiff:
Alvine Abanda, Anna Bolima, Dereje Yadeta and others
Defendant:
Saba Wolteji, OurBloc LLC, CreditDap LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Abanda et al v. OurBloc LLC et al
as 8:2023cv01071
Plaintiff:
Alvine Abanda, Anna Bolima, Dereje Yadeta and others
Defendant:
OurBloc LLC, CreditDap LLC, DapLabs LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
St. Rose v. Baltimore County Detention Center et al
as 1:2023cv01031
Plaintiff:
Lloyd St. Rose
Defendant:
Baltimore County Detention Center, Francis, Melvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jenkins v. Instant Brands LLC
as 1:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
Rose Jenkins
Defendant:
Instant Brands LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02887
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rhodes v. Nines et al
as 1:2022cv02621
Petitioner:
William Rhodes and William Rose
Respondent:
J. Nines and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
