Cases 51 - 60 of 2,821
Johnson, et al. v. Myers, et al.
as 24-349
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROSE JOHNSON, individually, and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Ryan M. Smith, and behalf of all beneficiaries, MARK SMITH, KAHLLENA A. SMITH and others
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MYERS and RYAN BEECROFT
Defendant:
CITY OF SEATTLE, a municipal corporation, DANIEL JOHNSON and DOES, 1-50
Thiele v. Stephenson et al
as 1:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Steve Thiele
Defendant:
Randall L. Stephenson, John T. Stankey, Pascal Desroches and others
Meek v. Hawaiian Holdings, Inc., et al
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Bryan Meek and Monteverde & Associates PC
Defendant:
Hawaiian Holdings, Inc., Peter R. Ingram, Lawrence S. Hershfield and others
Miller v. Stephenson et al
as 1:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
George Miller
Defendant:
Randall L. Stephenson, John T. Stankey, Pascal Desroches and others
Saliba v. Spokane Airport Board, et al.
as 24-175
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BAHIG SALIBA
Defendant / Appellee:
SPOKANE AIRPORT BOARD, doing business as Spokane International Airport, RICHARD HOLSCHEN, Officer; Acting as police officers for Spokane International Airport (SIA), CLAY CREEK, Officer; Acting as police officers for Spokane International Airport (SIA) and others
Owen v. Hawaiian Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
DeAnn Owen
Defendant:
Hawaiian Holdings, Inc., Lawrence S. Hershfield, Peter R. Ingram and others
Pedro-Diego, et al. v. Garland
as 24-115
Petitioner:
DIEGO PEDRO-DIEGO and ANA ROSELY PEDRO-FRANCISCO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Atas v. The New York Times Company
as 24-58
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, DEAN BAQUET, ELLEN POLLOCK and others
Defendant / Appellant:
NADIRE ATAS
LIBERTY LICENSING & CONSULTING, LLC v. JEWELED ROSE'S CONSULTING, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
LIBERTY LICENSING & CONSULTING, LLC
Defendant:
JEWELED ROSE'S CONSULTING, LLC, LAUREN R. PHILPOTT and ASHLEY REYES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
