Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Cook v. Starks et al
as 4:2021cv00151
Plaintiff:
Coby Cook
Defendant:
Warden Ora Starks, Rose Golliday, Kathryn Mcintyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Scott v. Jackson County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2021cv00189
Defendant:
Unknown Borderline, Vital Core Strategies, Amanda Harris and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Jacob Blair Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramsey v. Management Training & Corporation (MTC) et al
as 5:2020cv00170
Defendant:
Unknown St. Julian, Jane Doe, Rose Mary Gatlin and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Alexander Ramsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keyes v. Helfrich et al
as 2:2016cv00157
Plaintiff:
Floyd Anthony Keyes
Defendant:
Robert Bob Helfrich, Patricia Burchell, Craig Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. Barnes et al
as 1:2016cv00347
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Boyd
Defendant:
Timothy Barnes, Unknown Miller, Lee McLeod and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gales v. Helfrich et al
as 2:2015cv00022
Plaintiff:
Gene Gales, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert Helfrich, Zack Vaughn, Kassie Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edmonson v. Robinson et al
as 3:2014cv00522
Plaintiff:
Kenny Franklin Edmonson
Defendant:
Laurie Robinson, Cynthia Porter, Mellisa McCarter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Epps et al
as 3:2012cv00560
Plaintiff:
Ocie Hoskins
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, James Holman, Tina Ladger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardin v. Bennett et al
as 3:2011cv00614
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chance Hardin
Defendant:
Archie Bennett, City of Pearl, Shaun Terwilliger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winding v. Sistrunk et al
as 4:2011cv00143
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
B. Sistrunk, John Wright, Jaime Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
