Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Rosebud Sioux Tribe et al v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 4:2020cv00109
Defendant:
Bureau of Land Management, David Bernhardt, John Mehlhoff and others
Plaintiff:
Fort Belknap Indian Community and Rosebud Sioux Tribe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Confederated Tribes, et al v. Steven Mnuchin
as 20-5209
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Tulalip Tribes, Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians, Pueblo of Picuris and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
St. Mary's Native Corporation, Napaskiak, Incorporated, Sea Lion Corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government, 20-cv-01059, Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, 20-cv-01059, Rosebud Sioux Tribe, 20-cv-01059 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Steven T. Mnuchin, in his official capacity as Secretary of U.S. Department of the Treasury
Petitioner:
Cook Inlet Region, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
National Indian Gaming Association, California Tribal Chairperson's Association, California Nations Indian Gaming Association and others
Confederated Tribes, et al v. Steven Mnuchin
as 20-5204
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government, 20-cv-01059, Tulalip Tribes, Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Napaskiak, Incorporated, St. Mary's Native Corporation, Sea Lion Corporation and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Steven T. Mnuchin, in his official capacity as Secretary of U.S. Department of the Treasury
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ute Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation, 20-cv-01070
Amicus Curiae:
Cook Inlet Region, Inc., California Tribal Chairperson's Association, California Nations Indian Gaming Association and others
Confederated Tribes, et al v. Steven Mnuchin
as 20-5205
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government, 20-cv-01059, Nondalton Tribal Council, 20-cv-01059, Rosebud Sioux Tribe, 20-cv-01059 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Pueblo of Picuris, Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation, Tulalip Tribes and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Napaskiak, Incorporated, St. Mary's Native Corporation, Sea Lion Corporation and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Steven T. Mnuchin, in his official capacity as Secretary of U.S. Department of the Treasury
Amicus Curiae:
California Tribal Chairperson's Association, California Nations Indian Gaming Association, Alaska Federation of Natives and others
Petitioner:
Cook Inlet Region, Inc.
Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. USA, et al
as 20-2062
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America, James Driving Hawk, Director of the Great Plains Area Health Service, Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Rosebud Sioux Tribe, a federally recognized Indian tribe, and its individual members
Northern Plains, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 20-35415
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, BOLD ALLIANCE, NORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE COUNCIL and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN GAS ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, TRANSCANADA KEYSTONE PIPELINE, LP and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and TODD T. SEMONITE, In his official capacity and U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Amicus Curiae:
ENERGY EQUIPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE ALLIANCE, ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE COUNCIL, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, AND 17 OTHER STATES (TEXAS, ALABAMA, ALASKA, ARKANSAS, GEORGIA, INDIANA, KANSAS, KENTUCKY, LOUISIANA, MISSOURI, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, SOUTH CAROLINA, SOUTH DAKOTA, AND UTAH) and others
Northern Plains, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 20-35414
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, BOLD ALLIANCE, NORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE COUNCIL and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, STATE OF MONTANA, AMERICAN GAS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and TODD T. SEMONITE, In his official capacity and U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Amicus Curiae:
ENERGY EQUIPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE ALLIANCE, ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE COUNCIL, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, AND 17 OTHER STATES (TEXAS, ALABAMA, ALASKA, ARKANSAS, GEORGIA, INDIANA, KANSAS, KENTUCKY, LOUISIANA, MISSOURI, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, SOUTH CAROLINA, SOUTH DAKOTA, AND UTAH) and others
Northern Plains, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 20-35412
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, BOLD ALLIANCE, NORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE COUNCIL and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN GAS ASSOCIATION, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
TODD T. SEMONITE, In his official capacity and U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Amicus Curiae:
ENERGY EQUIPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE ALLIANCE, ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE COUNCIL, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, AND 17 OTHER STATES (TEXAS, ALABAMA, ALASKA, ARKANSAS, GEORGIA, INDIANA, KANSAS, KENTUCKY, LOUISIANA, MISSOURI, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, SOUTH CAROLINA, SOUTH DAKOTA, AND UTAH) and others
CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE et al v. MNUCHIN
as 1:2020cv01059
Defendant:
STEVEN MNUCHIN
Plaintiff:
ROSEBUD SIOUX TRIBE, CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, OGLALA SIOUX TRIBE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE CHEHALIS RESERVATION et al v. MNUCHIN
as 1:2020cv01002
Plaintiff:
TULALIP TRIBES, HOULTON BAND OF MALISEET INDIANS, AKIAK NATIVE COMMUNITY and others
Defendant:
STEVEN MNUCHIN
Intervenor Defendant:
NAPASKIAK, INCORPORATED, ALASKA NATIVE VILLAGE CORPORATION ASSOCIATION, INC., CALISTA CORPORATION and others
Amicus Curiae:
NATIVE AMERICAN FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY, AFFILIATED TRIBES OF NORTHWEST INDIANS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
