Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Rowell v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65320
Plaintiff:
Nathan Rowell
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rowell v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Douglas John Rowell
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rowell v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv02160
Plaintiff:
Maria Rowell
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Andrews v. City of Cleveland et al
as 1:2022cv00250
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Andrews
Defendant:
City of Cleveland, Detective William Hubbard, Detective Ernest Rowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rowell et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04056
Plaintiff:
MARIE LEE ROWELL and GORDON CHARLES ROWELL
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rowell et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03131
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Vickie Rowell and Kenneth Rowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curth et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00940
Plaintiff:
Michael E Curth , Penny Broughton , Eric Carlton and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Ondo et al v. City of Cleveland et al
as 1:2013cv00762
Defendant:
City of Cleveland, Clifford Kime, Thomas Tintelnot and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Ondo and Jonathan Simcox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rowell v. USA DeView, Inc.
as 2:2010cv00583
Plaintiff:
Randy Rowell
Defendant:
USA DeView, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
