Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Bridges v. Ward et al
as 5:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Bridges
Defendant:
Timothy C. Ward, Warden Walter Berry, Eric Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. Odum
as 4:2024cv00037
Petitioner:
James A. Frazier
Respondent:
Deputy Warden Roy Odum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frazier v. Odum
as 4:2024cv00027
Petitioner:
James A. Frazier
Respondent:
Warden Roy Odum
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Odum
as 1:2024cv00001
Petitioner:
Antonio Jones
Respondent:
Roy Odum
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Odum
as 5:2023cv00111
Petitioner:
Antonio Jones
Respondent:
Roy Odum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. ODUM
as 5:2023cv00482
Petitioner:
ANTONIO JONES
Respondent:
WARDEN ROY ODUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. Odum
as 2:2023cv00256
Petitioner:
Randal Lee Brooks
Respondent:
Roy Odum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STYLES v. ODUM
as 7:2023cv00103
Petitioner:
DERRICK STYLES
Respondent:
WARDEN ROY ODUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Styles v. Odum
as 4:2023cv00268
Petitioner:
Derrick Styles
Respondent:
Roy Odum
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beasley v. Odum
as 1:2023cv03870
Petitioner:
Isaac Beasley
Respondent:
Roy Odum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
