Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Ruchell Magee v. Daniel Cueva
as 22-70045
Petitioner:
RUCHELL CINQUE MAGEE
Respondent:
DANIEL E. CUEVA, Warden
Ruchell Magee v. USDC-SAC
as 20-70835
Not Classified By Court:
J. ENRIQUEZ, In re: RUCHELL CINQUE MAGEE, TIMOTHY A. REARDON and others
Petitioner:
RUCHELL CINQUE MAGEE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Ruchell Magee v. Steven Arkowitz, et al
as 20-15384
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUCHELL CINQUE MAGEE
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY A. REARDON, J. ENRIQUEZ and STEVEN ARKOWITZ
(PC) Magee v. Delaney et al
as 2:2019cv01634
Defendant:
Yvonne G. Rogers, Carolyn K. Delaney and Kendall J. Newman
Plaintiff:
Ruchell Cinque Magee- PREFILING ORDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Magee v. Castello et al
as 4:2019cv04340
Respondent:
California Parole Board Judges and J. Castello
Petitioner:
Ruchell Cinque Magee- PREFILING ORDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(HC) Magee v. Castello et al
as 2:2019cv01182
Respondent:
California Parole Board Judges and J. Castello
Petitioner:
Ruchell Cinque Magee- PREFILING ORDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Magee v. Arkowitz et al
as 2:2019cv00172
Plaintiff:
Ruchell Cinque Magee and Ruchell Cinque Magee- PREFILING ORDER
Defendant:
Steven Arkowitz, Timothy A. Reardon and J. Enriquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv07112
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
(PC) Magee v. Director California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2018cv04518
Plaintiff:
Ruchell Cinque Magee
Defendant:
Timothy A. Reardon and Director California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Magee v. Orrick et al
as 3:2018cv03971
Plaintiff:
Ruchell Cinque Magee
Defendant:
Steven Arkowitz, William H. Orrick and G. Powe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
