Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Blackshear, Jr., Ph.D. v. Sotelo-Hernandez et al
as 2:2023cv01815
Plaintiff:
Earnest Howard Rudolph-Blackshear, Jr., Ph.D. and Earnest Howard-Rudolph Blackshear, Ph.D., Jr
Defendant:
Bernardo Sotelo-Hernandez, MTC Financial Inc. doing business as Trustee Corps, Freedom Mortgage Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alzua v. Sheriff of Washoe County et al
as 3:2022cv00312
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Alzua
Defendant:
Sheriff of Washoe County and Detention Center Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bai v. Johnson et al
as 2:2020cv02192
Defendant:
Bob Faulkner, Garrett, Ontiveros and others
Plaintiff:
Xiao Ye Bai
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D'Arcy v. Nevada Gold & Casinos, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00025
Defendant:
William J. Sherlock, Shawn W. Kravetz, Rudolph K. Kluiber and others
Plaintiff:
Peter D'Arcy
Assad v. Nevada Gold & Casinos, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00026
Defendant:
William J. Sherlock, Shawn W. Kravetz, Francis M. Ricci and others
Plaintiff:
George Assad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kikendall v. Nevada Gold & Casinos, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02323
Defendant:
William J. Sherlock, Shawn W. Kravetz, Francis M. Ricci and others
Plaintiff:
William Kikendall
Rudolph v. USA
as 2:2017cv00370
Petitioner:
Craig Rudolph
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rivera v. Cox et al
as 2:2015cv00221
Respondent:
James Gregory Cox, Adam Laxale and The AttorneyGeneral of the State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Rudolph William Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:1998cv01326
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00256
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
