Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Garcia v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2023cv02203
Plaintiff:
Rudolph A Garcia and Rudolph A. Garcia
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
George v. USA ***DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE. All filings to be made in criminal case 16-20029.
as 2:2020cv02307
Petitioner:
Rudolph E. George
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bledsoe v. Ad Astra Recovery Services, Inc.
as 2:2017cv02213
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Bledsoe
Defendant:
Ad Astra Recovery Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Buchholz et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv07932
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Buchholz , Dale Alan Karn , Karn Farms and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Itzen v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv07692
Plaintiff:
Rudolph P. Itzen
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In Re: Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation
as 2:2014md02591
Plaintiff:
Eagle-View Dairy, LLC, Michael D. Tiede, Frank Hagenmaier and others
Petitioner:
Law Offices of Michael Miller, PC, Call & Gentry Law Group, LLC, Gellhaus & Gellhaus, PC and others
Other:
Harry G. Barber, Jr. and Sharon Brunet
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Syngenta Crop Protection AG
Defendant:
Bunge North America, Inc.
Interested Party:
Nolan Law Group and Lowe Eklund Wakefield Co., LPA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407
Rudolph v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2010cv01163
Plaintiff:
Edward Rudolph
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Rodriguez v. Anderson et al
as 5:2009cv03107
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Rodriguez
Defendant:
Keith Anderson, Sam Cline, M. Vanhoose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
