Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Tedder et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2023cv02812
Plaintiff:
William Tedder, Maureen Cobb, Richard Tyler and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Ruffin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00723
Plaintiff:
La'Retta Jecisia Ruffin and Ruffin La'Retta
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
King v. Ruffin et al
as 1:2022cv01596
Plaintiff:
Sharif King
Defendant:
Louise Ruffin and Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ruffin v. New York State Parole et al
as 1:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
Ennis Edward Ruffin
Defendant:
New York State Parole and Niagara County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ruffin v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv05845
Plaintiff:
Maxwell Ruffin
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Ruffin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00577
Plaintiff:
Roderick Ruffin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ruffin v. United States of America et al
as 2:2020cv04128
Defendant:
E. Giannopoulos, United States Postal Service and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Maxwell Ruffin
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv05422
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv02203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Ruffin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv01196
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Lanique Quentell Ruffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
