Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Rodhouse et al v. Skechers USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00471
Plaintiff:
Sarah Rodhouse , Misty Mackey , Sharon Mavis and others
Defendant:
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. , Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rush v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00780
Plaintiff:
Joanne Rush
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. , Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cox v. Vencent et al
as 3:2012cv00516
Plaintiff:
Claude Cox
Defendant:
Vencent, J J and Rushing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Rush et al
as 6:2012cv00114
Plaintiff:
James Daniel Johnson
Defendant:
Stephanie K. Rush, J. Ray Ormond and Jennifer Kidd Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Galvan et al v. Rush Trucking, Inc. et al
as 6:2012cv00035
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Galvan and Billy Brewer
Defendant:
Rush Trucking, Inc. and Terry D. Widner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Premiertox, Inc. et al v. Kentucky Spirit Health Plan, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00010
Plaintiff:
Premiertox, Inc. and Premiertox 2.0, Inc.
Defendant:
Kentucky Spirit Health Plan, Inc. , Centene Corporation and Jean Rush
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rushing v. Chase Auto Finance Corp. et al
as 5:2011cv00419
Plaintiff:
Marcie Rushing
Defendant:
Chase Auto Finance Corp. and Leading Edge Recovery Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Spencer v. Wilson et al
as 6:2011cv00128
Plaintiff:
Bart Spencer
Defendant:
Eric D. Wilson, Rush, Willard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Lappin et al
as 6:2011cv00273
Plaintiff:
Monroe L. Coleman
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Helen J. Marberry, Andrea McPherson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marksberry v. Strode et al
as 1:2010cv00105
Plaintiff:
Grant Rush Marksberry
Defendant:
Jackie T. Strode and Gayle Eston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
