Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Rushing v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv32125
Plaintiff:
Dorothy J. Rushing
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rush et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv30859
Plaintiff:
Margie Rush and Emsie Rush, Jr.
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rushing v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv29505
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Rushing
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rushing v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv29574
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Rushing
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rushing v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv27507
Plaintiff:
Christy Rushing
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rush v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv21787
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ann Rush
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rush v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv21679
Plaintiff:
Elsyner Rush
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rushing et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv18792
Plaintiff:
Teresa Rushing and Michael Junior Rushing
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rush v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv17370
Plaintiff:
Sadie L. Rush
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rushing et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv16137
Plaintiff:
Janice Rushing and Tim Rushing
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
