Cases 1 - 10 of 10
THOMPSON et al v. MAINE CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 2:2020cv00485
Defendant:
PENNY BAILEY, MAINE CORRECTIONAL CENTER, RANDALL LIBERTY and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL ALLEN THOMPSON
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAY v. DOC et al
as 2:2020cv00196
Petitioner:
RUSSELL C JAY
Respondent:
COMM LIBERTY, MCC and DOC
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - HABEAS CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NERVAL v. WORCESTER
as 1:2020cv00122
Respondent:
RUSSELL WORCESTER
Petitioner:
DOMINIC NERVAL
Interested Party:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - HABEAS CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RUFFIN v. FITZPATRICK et al
as 1:2014cv00453
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ONEIL RUFFIN
Defendant:
JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, JODY BRETON, RUSSELL WORCESTER, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ERICSON v. MAGNUSSON et al
as 2:2012cv00178
Plaintiff:
ERIC ERICSON
Defendant:
MARTIN MAGNUSSON, JOSEPH PONTE, PATRICIA BARNHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JUDD v. SECRETARY OF STATE OF MAINE et al
as 1:2011cv00212
Plaintiff:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF STATE OF MAINE, BUREAU OF CORPORATIONS, ELECTIONS AND COMMISSIONERS and STATE OF MAINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILBERT v. PEASE et al
as 1:2011cv00207
Plaintiff:
DONALD LEWIS GILBERT
Defendant:
ROBERT PEASE, SCOTT DRAKE, RUSSELL WORCESTER, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JUDD v. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 2:2010cv00382
Respondent:
US ATTORNEY GENERAL , HARLEY G LAPPIN , FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Petitioner:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
THOMAS v. USA
as 2:2009cv00058
Petitioner:
RUSSELL STEPHEN THOMAS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BROWN v. MAGNUSSON et al
as 1:2007cv00061
Plaintiff:
DEANE BROWN
Defendant:
MARTIN MAGNUSSON , JEFFREY MERRILL , JAMES O'FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
