Cases 1 - 8 of 8
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv29132
Plaintiff:
RUSSEL THOMPSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv26035
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DIRK RUSSELL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv37450
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN RUSSELL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv02139
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DIRK RUSSELL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Nanan et al v. Clayton County Police Department et al
as 1:2012cv00737
Plaintiff:
Mahabir Nanan, Shennielle Shelle Youhoing, Mohaberry D. Youhoing-Nanan and others
Defendant:
Clayton County Police Department, Clayton County Sheriff Department, Clayton County Animal Control and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Youhoing et al v. Clayton County Police Department et al
as 1:2012cv00736
Plaintiff:
Shennielle Shelle Youhoing, Mahabir Nanan, Mohaberry D. Youhoing-Nanan and others
Defendant:
Clayton County Police Department, Clayton County Sheriff Department, Clayton County Animal Control and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nanan v. Clayton County Police Department et al
as 1:2012cv00730
Plaintiff:
Mahabir Nanan
Defendant:
Clayton County Police Department, Clayton County Sheriff Department, Clayton County Animal Control and others
Movant:
Shennielle Shellie S Youhoing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
