Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 45
In re: James Rieves
as 22-0503
Petitioner: In re: JAMES SWAIN RIEVES
Respondent: TOWN OF SMYRNA, TN, POLICE CHIEF KEVIN ARNOLD, in his official and individual capacity, RUTHERFORD COUNTY, TN and others
Alleghany County, North Carolina et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv07039
Plaintiff: Alleghany County, North Carolina, Anson County, North Carolina, Buncombe County, North Carolina and others
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Alleghany County, North Carolina et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 5:2022cv00155
Plaintiff: Alleghany County, North Carolina, Anson County, North Carolina, Buncombe County, North Carolina and others
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Andre Johnson v. Charles Rettig, et al
as 21-5648
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANDRE LEMAURIO JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee: CHARLES PAUL RETTIG, Commissioner Internal Revenue Service, TERRY HARGETT, Tennessee Secretary of State, JANET YELLEN, Treasury Secretary of the United States and others
Univ Life Church Monastery, et al v. Wayne Nabors, et al
as 21-5100
Plaintiff / Appellee: GABRIEL BISER, an individual, UNIVERSAL LIFE CHURCH MONASTERY STOREHOUSE, a Washington non-profit corporation and ERIN PATTERSON, an individual
Defendant / Appellant: WILLIAM F. KNOWLES, in his official capacity as County Clerk of Hamilton County, TN, HERBERT H. SLATERY, III, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Tennessee, NEAL PINKSTON, in his official capacity as District Attorney General for Hamilton County, TN and others
Defendant / Appellee: BILL LEE, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Tennessee
Univ Life Church Monastery, et al v. Wayne Nabors, et al
as 21-5048
Defendant: WAYNE NABORS, in his official capacity as County Clerk of Putnam County, TN
Defendant / Appellant: HERBERT H. SLATERY, III, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Tennessee, JENNINGS H. JONES, in his official capacity as District Attorney General for Rutherford County, TN, KIM R. HELPER, in her official capacity as District Attorney General for Rutherford County, TN and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: TIMEAKA FARRIS, a married couple, JAMES WELCH, an individual, ERIN PATTERSON, an individual and others
Univ Life Church Monastery, et al v. Wayne Nabors, et al
as 21-5057
Defendant: WAYNE NABORS, in his official capacity as County Clerk of Putnam County, TN
Plaintiff / Appellee: TIMEAKA FARRIS, a married couple, JAMES WELCH, an individual, ERIN PATTERSON, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellant: LISA DUKE CROWELL, in her official capacity as County Clerk of Rutherford County, TN
Leonard Singer v. Aaron Price, et al
as 20-5832
Defendant / Appellee: PALMER GIBBS, Officer, RUTHERFORD COUNTY, TENNESSEE, DAVID M. BRAGGS, Honorable and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: LEONARD SINGER
Univ Life Church Monastery, et al v. Wayne Nabors, et al
as 19-6217
Defendant / Appellant: NEAL PINKSTON, in his official capacity as District Attorney General for Hamilton County, HERBERT H. SLATERY, III, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Tennessee, BILL LEE, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Tennessee and others
Defendant: WAYNE NABORS
Plaintiff / Appellee: GALE PLUMM, a married couple, TIMEAKA FARRIS, a married couple, JAMES WELCH, an individual and others
James Rieves, et al v. Town of Smyrna, Tennessee, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-5347
Plaintiff / Appellee: GEORGE HANNA, FREDERICK SUBLETT, EHAB MALATY and others
Defendant: JOHN ZIMMERMAN, in his individual capacity, KEVIN ARNOLD, in his official and individual capacity, JENNINGS JONES, in his individual capacity and others
Defendant / Appellant: MIKE FITZHUGH, in his official and individual capacity

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?