Cases 1 - 10 of 87
BOWMAN v. JONES et al
as 4:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
ERICK DAWAYNE BOWMAN
Respondent:
JONES, WILLIE WILSON and RUTLEDGE STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv01299
Plaintiff:
Erick Dawayne Bowman
Defendant:
Medical Nurse Dr. Jones, Willie Wilson and Rutledge State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00667
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Woods v. Wiza et al
as 1:2024cv00575
Petitioner:
Fabian Woods, Jr.
Respondent:
Scott Wiza and Rutledge State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hernandez et al v. RUTCO, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Ana Hernandez, Jose Alfredo Rocha Herrera and Patricia Moreno
Defendant:
RUTCO, LLC, RUTCO Transport LLC and Ty Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
DAVIS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
QYMOAN DAVIS
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF GEORGIA, Warden REAGAN BLACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELLAS v. GORDON et al
as 5:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LYNN BELLAS
Defendant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY GORDON, DEPUTY WARDEN FLEMMINGS and RUTLEDGE STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
