Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 24-40307
Petitioner:
Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01129
Petitioner:
Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00090
Petitioner:
Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00689
Petitioner:
Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04133
Petitioner:
Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ryan BonnerIn re: Ryan Bonner
as 23-40609
Petitioner:
In re: Ryan Rydell Bonner, also known as Pookie
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 22-40838
Petitioner / Appellant:
Ryan Rydell Bonner, also known as Pookie
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Bonner v. Pearcy
as 22-40757
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ryan Rydell Bonner, also known as Pookie
Defendant / Appellee:
Brian A. Pearcy, Law Enforcement, City of Galveston Police Department, J. Melancon, Law Enforcement, City of Galveston Police Department, Jack Roady, Galveston County Criminal District Attorney and others
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 3:2022cv00377
Petitioner:
Ryan Rydell Bonner and Pookie
Respondent:
C. Meador and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bonner v. Pearcy
as 22-40137
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ryan Rydell Bonner, also known as Pookie
Defendant / Appellee:
Brian A. Pearcy, Law Enforcement, City of Galveston Police Department, J. Melancon, Law Enforcement, City of Galveston Police Department, Jack Roady, Galveston County Criminal District Attorney and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
