Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Tabullo et al v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00993
Defendant:
Harold Waford Burns and Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Maria Tabullo and Rafael Tabullo
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv01584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc
as 4:2014mc01274
Plaintiff:
Nicholas D Brooks
Defendant:
Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc
Logitraq, LLC v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.
as 6:2014cv00214
Plaintiff:
Logitraq, LLC
Defendant:
Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Dunagan v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.
as 4:2013cv03496
Plaintiff:
Brian Dunagan
Defendant:
Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Hubbard v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc et al
as 4:2013cv01079
Defendant:
Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc , Ryder Integrated Logistics, LLC , Ryder System, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Edwin Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Kennedy v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv00157
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Kennedy
Defendant:
Ryder Integrated Logistics of Texas, LLC and Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Garcia v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. et al
as 5:2011cv00340
Defendant:
George Deslatte, Jr. and Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv02439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Timely Integrated, Inc. v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00285
Plaintiff:
Timely Integrated, Inc.
Defendant:
Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
