Cases 1 - 10 of 29
HAMILTON v. DOLCE et al
as 3:2018cv02615
Plaintiff:
ABDUS SAMAD HAMILTON
Defendant:
RALPH DOLCE, STEPHEN D'ILIO, ANTONIO CAMPOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv03359
Plaintiff:
LARRY S. DAVIS
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON v. ESSEX COUNTY JAIL RE-ENTRY PROGRAM et al
as 2:2017cv00694
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILSON
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY JAIL RE-ENTRY PROGRAM, GREEN, S. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. KAMINSKI et al
as 2:2015cv01237
Plaintiff:
TYRONE WHITE
Defendant:
TRACEY S. KAMINSKI, MERRIL MAIN, J. OTTINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHEMELIA v. KAMINSKI et al
as 2:2015cv01238
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SCHEMELIA
Defendant:
TRACEY S. KAMINSKI, MERRIL MAIN, J. OTTINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARSON v. MAIN et al
as 2:2014cv07454
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARSON
Defendant:
MERRIL MAIN, SHANTAY ADAMS, S. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. MRS S. DAVIS et al
as 2:2014cv07341
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM THOMAS
Defendant:
MRS S. DAVIS, MRS. SHANTAY ADAMS, JACYLEN OTTINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2014cv05774
Plaintiff:
WALTER WOODS, JR.
Defendant:
S. DAVIS, S. KAMINSKI, MERRIL MAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOSS et al v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2014cv05771
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE BOSS, DONNELI WOLFE, THADDEUS THOMAS and others
Defendant:
S. DAVIS, S. KAMINSKI, MERRIL MAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMSON v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2014cv05770
Plaintiff:
JIHAD WILLIAMSON
Defendant:
S. DAVIS, S. KAMINISKI, MERRIL MAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
