Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Gonzales v. Baugh et al
as 9:2022cv00082
Plaintiff:
Michael Angel Gonzales
Defendant:
Korie Baugh, Christopher A. Farrell, Kurtis D. Pharr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington v. Martin et al
as 9:2019cv00143
Defendant:
Mark Roberts, Dotun M Fasan, Beth Pipkins and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Wayne Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe v. Richardson et al
as 3:2018cv01366
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Kenard Joe
Defendant:
Warden Kendall T Richardson, Jennifer S Brown, Brian Collier-TDCJ Executive Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milton v. Gonzales, et al
as 1:2018cv00061
Plaintiff:
Matthew D Milton
Defendant:
L Gonzales, Lanny S Brown, Corey J Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lenor v. Arellano et al
as 4:2016cv01099
Plaintiff:
Donald R Lenor
Defendant:
Lorena D Arellano, Billye J. Forrest and Meesha S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosley v. Blackwell et al
as 1:2014cv00182
Plaintiff:
Damond Undray Mosley
Defendant:
D Blackwell, F Wyatt, V Bosion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosley v. Blackwell et al
as 1:2014cv00178
Plaintiff:
Damond Undray Mosley
Defendant:
D Blackwell, F Wyatt, V Bosion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peters v. Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 1:2010cv00129
Petitioner:
Tony Shane Peters
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID, Lonnie Johnson, E Benoit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peters v. Quarterman et al
as 9:2010cv00041
Petitioner:
Tony Shane Peters
Respondent:
N. Quarterman, L Johnson, E Benoit and others
Defendant:
S Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peters v. Quarterman et al
as 1:2010cv00132
Petitioner:
Tony Shane Peters
Respondent:
N. Quarterman, L Johnson, E Benoit and others
Defendant:
S Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
