Cases 1 - 10 of 44
USA v. Michael Greene
as 23-3141
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael S. Greene, also known as Michael Dean Simmons
Green v. Servis One, Inc.
as 8:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Green
Defendant:
SERVIS ONE, INC. d/b/a BSI FINANCIAL SERVICES and Servis One, Inc. doing business as BSI Financial Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jones v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Brian Jones
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Cort L. O'Haver, Peggy Y. Fowler and others
Wilson v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Jordan Wilson
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Peggy Fowler, Stephen M. Gambee and others
Mason v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10912
Plaintiff:
Richard Mason
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Peggy Y. Fowler, Cort Lane O'Haver and others
Green v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv06729
Plaintiff:
Mike Green
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Peggy Y. Fowler, Cort Lane OHaver and others
Neely v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10171
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Neely
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Columbia Banking System, Inc., Cascade Merger Sub, Inc. and others
James Davis v. Christopher Morledge, et al
as 21-3420
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Ray Davis
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher Morledge, Judge, St. Francis County Circuit Court (Originally named as Christopher Marledge), Austin Easley, Prosecutor, St. Francis County, John Houseal, Prosecutor, St. Francis County and others
William Mitchell v. Kathleen Green
as 21-7451
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM JAMES MITCHELL
Respondent / Appellee:
KATHLEEN S. GREEN, Warden and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Damien Sublett v. Linda Green, et al
as 21-5300
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAMIEN SUBLETT
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN TANGEROSE, CHRIS HATTON and LINDA S. GREEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
