Cases 1 - 10 of 122
Villagrana v. Kernan et al
as 4:2022cv02618
Plaintiff:
Ambrosio Villagrana
Defendant:
Scott Kernan and S. Hatton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Baptiste v. B. Martinez, et al
as 21-16357
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH EMANUEL BAPTISTE
Defendant / Appellee:
B. MARTINEZ, Correctional Counselor II, M. WYNN, Senior Staff Psychologist, J. HOWLIN, Chief of Mental Health and others
Defendant:
J. LEWIS, Deputy Director of Policy and Risk Management, of CDC Healthcare Services and S. HATTON, Warden
Campbell v. Calis et al
as 5:2021cv05187
Plaintiff:
Senarble Campbell
Defendant:
Calis, M. Thomas, Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Bogarin v. S. Hatton, et al
as 21-55693
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY BOGARIN
Respondent / Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA and S. HATTON, Warden
Kelvin Sims v. F. De La Torre, et al
as 21-15778
Defendant / Appellee:
J. TRUETT, Appeals Coordinator, CTF-C, M. GONZALES, Correctional Officer, CTF-C, B. MARTINEZ, CCll, CTF-C and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KELVIN EUGENE SIMS
Kwang Chol Joy v. S. Hatton
as 20-55977
Petitioner / Appellant:
KWANG CHOL JOY
Respondent / Appellee:
S. HATTON, Warden
Johnny Moore v. S. Hatton, et al
as 20-16701
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNNY ANDREW MOORE
Defendant / Appellee:
M. BITER, S. HATTON, KIERNON and others
Moore v. Hatton et al
as 5:2020cv01445
Defendant:
K. Hoffmon, M. Atchey and S. Hatton
Plaintiff:
Johnny Andrew Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Strawn v. S. Hatton
as 20-15264
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD STRAWN
Respondent / Appellee:
S. HATTON
David Andrews v. B. Martinez, et al
as 19-17087
Defendant / Appellee:
C. HOYT, Correctional Officer, B. MARTINEZ, Correctional Counselor II, A. ANDERSON, Commissioner and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID RAYMOND ANDREWS
Defendant:
C. CHRISTENSEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
