Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5040
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
MOSKOVITS v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2023cv02958
Plaintiff: ALEXANDER MOSKOVITS
Defendant: SCOTT S. HARRIS and REDMOND K. BARNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5166
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01399
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00986
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5019
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Allan Schubert v. Lisa Nesbitt, et al
as 23-5016
Plaintiff / Appellant: Allan D. Schubert
Defendant / Appellee: Lisa Nesbitt, Michael Duggan and Scott S. Harris
MASSEY v. HARRIS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv03318
Plaintiff: QUAMAINE LEE MASSEY
Defendant: SCOTT S. HARRIS and LISA NESBITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5060
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
PATTERSON v. HARRIS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00697
Petitioner: BRENDA A. PATTERSON
Respondent: SCOTT S. HARRIS, KRISTEN M. CLARKE and ANGELA D. CAESAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?