Cases 1 - 7 of 7
FAKE et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2020cv01283
Defendant:
WILLIAM H. KETTERLINUS, BRIAN ZARALLO, ANITA N. BOTCHWAY and others
Plaintiff:
CAITLIN B. FAKE, SUSAN B. FAKE and BRANDON L. FAKE
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962
Larry Pelzer, Jr. v. Office of Child Support, et al
as 19-3411
Defendant / Appellee:
BEVERLY ROBINSON, 45 C.F.R. 75.2 CONTRACTOR CONFERENCE OFFICER, JOSEPH C. KAMNIK, 45 C.F.R. 75.2 CONTRACT OR DIRECTOR OF TITLE IV-D FRANCHISE, MARGARET T. MURPHY, 45 C.F.R. 75.2 CONTRACTOR ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY M. PELZER, JR.
In re: David S. Johnson
as 13-1462
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: DAVID S. JOHNSON
Defendant - Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Johnson et al v. Gross et al
as 3:2008mc00086
Plaintiff:
Robbie S. Johnson, Robbie S. Johnson Revocable Trust and Lorraine Wagman Revocable trust
Defendant:
Mitchell Alan Gross, 5th Ring Enterprises Limited partnership, Debra L. Gross and others
Receiver:
Kevin O'Halloran and Kevin O'Halloran
JOHNSON et al v. GROSS et al
as 2:2008mc00099
Plaintiff:
ROBBIE S. JOHNSON, ROBBIE S. JOHNSON and ROBBIE S. JOHNSON
Receiver:
KEVIN O'HALLORAN
Defendant:
MITCHELL ALAN GROSS, 5TH RING ENTERPRISES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, DEBRA L. GROSS and others
JOHNSON et al v. GROSS et al
as 2:2008mc00059
Plaintiff:
ROBBIE S. JOHNSON, ROBBIE S. JOHNSON and ROBBIE S. JOHNSON
Defendant:
MITCHELL ALAN GROSS, 5TH RING ENTERPRISES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, DEBRA L. GROSS and others
Receiver:
KEVIN O'HALLORAN and KEVIN O'HALLORAN
Cause Of Action: Local Question
Johnson et al v. Gross et al
as 1:2008mc00061
Plaintiff:
Robbie S. Johnson and Robbie S. Johnson
Defendant:
Mitchell Alan Gross, 5th Ring Enterprises Limited Partnership, Debra L. Gross and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
