Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Dennis Ettlin v. Kamala Harris et al
as 8:2014cv00324
Defendant:
Michael Antonovich, Tani Cantil-Sakauye, County of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ettlin
Dennis Ettlin v. Kamala Harris et al
as 5:2014cv00406
Defendant:
Michael Antonovich, County of Los Angeles, DOES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ettlin
JAMES et al v. FOLEY et al
as 2:2012cv00122
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE S. JAMES and MARILYN JAMES
Defendant:
MARYBETH FOLEY and JOHN FOLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker et al v. Jayco, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv03571
Plaintiff:
Sheila Wolfe Baker , Helen S. James , Huey Paul James and others
Defendant:
Jayco, Inc., Jayco Enterprises, Inc., CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
King et al v. CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv02882
Plaintiff:
Starlett M. King , Arthur P. Acevedo , Tiffany S. James and others
Defendant:
CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc., Bechtel National Inc., Shaw Environmental, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
JAMES v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv70618
Plaintiff:
ERNEST S. JAMES and JUDY JAMES
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, INCORPORATED, ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Bergeron et al v. Jayco Enterprises Inc et al
as 2:2009cv03719
Plaintiff:
Alvin Bergeron, Alvin Bergeron, Alvin Bergeron and others
Defendant:
Jayco Enterprises Inc, Shaw Environmental Inc, Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
JAMES et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv61890
Plaintiff:
HOMER S. JAMES and ROSALIE JAMES
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., AC&S, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
