Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Ramirez v. People of the State of California
as 2:2014cv00832
Petitioner:
Eugene S. Ramirez
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alford v. Dang, et al.
as 2:2014cv00714
Plaintiff:
Tracy Fidel Alford
Defendant:
Lam Dang, Jones, J. Clough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Deutsche Bank As Trustee et al
as 1:2014cv00308
Plaintiff:
Honorio S. Ramirez
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank As Trustee, JP Morgan Chase NA , Long Beach Mortgage Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ramirez v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2013cv00352
Plaintiff:
Honoro S Ramirez
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and California Reconveyance Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
RAMIREZ v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2013at00137
Plaintiff:
HONORIO S RAMIREZ
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Caliofornia Reconveyance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Rose Ann Fernandez v. CDCR et al
as 5:2013cv00203
Defendant:
J V Allen, J V Allen, M L Alvarado and others
Plaintiff:
Rose Ann Fernandez
Garden City Boxing v. Fernando S Ramirez
as 2:2003cv05852
Plaintiff:
Garden City Boxing Club Inc
Unknown:
J Spencer Letts and Carla Woehrle
Defendant:
Fernando S Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
J & J Sports Productions Inc v. Javier S Ramirez
as 5:2010cv01869
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions Inc
Defendant:
Javier S Ramirez
Magdalena S. Ramirez v. United States of America
as 2:2009cv04376
Petitioner:
Magdalena S. Ramirez
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Martin v. Ramirez et al
as 5:2008cv01783
Plaintiff:
Arthur Ray Martin, Jr.
Defendant:
S Ramirez and Facio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
