Cases 1 - 10 of 10
EALY v. CORIZON et al
as 5:2017cv00304
Plaintiff:
EARVIN EALY
Defendant:
CORIZON, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LYTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence Simpkins v. Gulf CI Warden, et al
as 16-17386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE E. SIMPKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
GULF CI WARDEN, S. RODDENBERRY, ASST WARDEN OF GULF CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, JAMES GAINNIE, Captain and others
Christopher Cowart v. Steven Owens, et al
as 16-15432
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER T. COWART
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN OWENS, Sergeant, MATTHEW FIQUETT, Officer, GAINIE, Captain and others
CENTENNIAL BANK v. RODDENBERRY et al
as 7:2013mc00007
Plaintiff:
CENTENNIAL BANK
Defendant:
JAMES T RODDENBERRY, KIMBERLY S RODDENBERRY and HAMAKNOCKERS LTD CO
CENTENNIAL BANK v. RODDENBERRY et al
as 7:2013mc00006
Plaintiff:
CENTENNIAL BANK
Defendant:
JAMES T RODDENBERRY, KIMBERLY S RODDENBERRY and HAMAKNOCKERS LTD CO
RODDENBERRY v. CORIZON HEALTH INC
as 4:2011cv00635
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY S RODDENBERRY
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CENTENNIAL BANK v. RODDENBERRY et al
as 4:2011cv00369
Plaintiff:
CENTENNIAL BANK
Defendant:
Marshals Service, HAMAKNOCKERS LTD CO, KIMBERLY S RODDENBERRY and others
Not Yet Classified:
TITAN DEVELOPMENT CO., INC. and FOUR BERRIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howard v. Liszak et al
as 2:2008cv00227
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Fitzgerald Howard
Defendant:
T. Liszak, D. Snider, P. Mann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Liszak et al
as 2:2008cv00139
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Fitzgerald Howard
Defendant:
T. Liszak, D. Snider, P. Mann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Secretary, DOC et al
as 2:2007cv00603
Plaintiff:
Donald Hall
Defendant:
Secretary, DOC, MCI Telecommunications, Adro L. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
