Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Dancy v. USP Coleman 1 Staff et al
as 5:2023cv00592
Plaintiff: Larry Dancy
Defendant: USP Coleman 1 Staff, S. Withers, FNU Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mosley v. Withers
as 2:2022cv00790
Petitioner: Ricardo Mosley
Respondent: S. Withers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jackson v. Withers
as 2:2022cv00791
Petitioner: Eugene Jackson
Respondent: S. Withers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Walker v. Withers
as 3:2022cv00016
Plaintiff: Andre A. Walker
Defendant: S. Withers
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Steward v. Withers
as 3:2022cv00003
Plaintiff: Christopher L. Steward
Defendant: Complex Warden S. Withers
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McCoy v. Withers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00494
Plaintiff: Shawn McCoy
Defendant: Warden S. Withers
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Butler v. Withers
as 3:2021cv00284
Defendant: S. Withers
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Plaintiff: David Jerome Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brunet v. Withers
as 3:2021cv00182
Defendant: Warden S. Withers
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Plaintiff: Julio-Armando Brunet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv01102
Plaintiff: GARY LEE SMITH
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MARK S. INCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Husband v. Dixon et al
as 6:2014cv00032
Plaintiff: Eunice Husband
Defendant: M. Dixon, L.R. Etris, L. Chaney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?