Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Dutkevich et al v. Sam's East Inc
as 3:2018cv00126
Plaintiff:
Bogdana Dutkevich and Eugene Dutkevich
Defendant:
Sam's East Inc
Mediator:
Joseph V Simeri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02860
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00177
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
VALDOVINES et al v. SAM'S EAST, INC.
as 1:2015cv01958
Defendant:
SAM'S EAST, INC., SAM'S REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST and WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Plaintiff:
MISTI VALDOVINES and NESTOR VALDOVINES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
INDIAN INDUSTRIES, INC. v. SAM'S EAST, INC.
as 3:2013cv00192
Plaintiff:
INDIAN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
SAM'S EAST, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
INDIAN INDUSTRIES, INC. v. SAM'S EAST, INC.
as 3:2013cv00191
Plaintiff:
INDIAN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Intervenor Defendant:
Medal Sports (Taiwan) Corporation
Defendant:
SAM'S EAST, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
JONES v. SAM'S EAST, INC.
as 1:2013cv01588
Plaintiff:
ELAINE JONES
Defendant:
SAM'S EAST, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
SUBLETT v. SAM'S EAST, INC.
as 1:2011cv00633
Defendant:
SAM'S EAST, INC. and SAM'S REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST
Plaintiff:
MAURICE SUBLETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
