Cases 1 - 10 of 57
McCormick v. PB&G Restaurant Group, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Daniel McCormick
Defendant:
PB&G Restaurant Group, LLC, Sammy Peroulas and PB&G Restaurant Group, LLC doing business as Pero's Bar and Grill
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Arnold et al v. Ward (Walley)
as 1:2023cv01249
Plaintiff:
Sammie Arnold and Gay Gregson
Defendant:
Amanda Ward (Walley)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Crawl v. Durrett (TV3)
as 1:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Stacy L. Crawl and Desha E. Crawl
Defendant:
Sammie B. Durrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Lanham v. Woodall et al
as 1:2022cv01168
Plaintiff:
Perry Lanham
Defendant:
Dennis Woodall, Mike Fielder, Sammy Davison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Commissioner Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
Sammie Lemuel Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Moffett v. Hardeman County et al
as 1:2022cv01045
Plaintiff:
Cameron Moffett
Defendant:
Hardeman County, Hardeman County Correctional Facilities Corporation, CoreCivic Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ayers v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (TV1)
as 3:2021cv00213
Plaintiff:
Sammy Orville Ayers
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Harris v. Rogers
as 2:2021cv02230
Respondent:
Sammy Rogers and Warden Douglas Williams
Petitioner:
Brandon Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tumlin v. Rogers
as 1:2021cv00058
Petitioner:
Reginald D. Tumlin
Respondent:
Sammy Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tumlin v. Rogers
as 1:2021cv01043
Petitioner:
Reginald D. Tumlin
Respondent:
Sammy Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
