Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company II v. Rivera-Arroyo et al
as 3:2015cv02704
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company II
Defendant:
Samuel Rivera-Arroyo, Migdalia Santiago-Cabeza and Conjugal Partnership Rivera-Santiago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Rivera-De Leon et al
as 3:2015cv01636
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
Samuel Rivera-De Leon, Mirqueya Elizabeth Bautista-Feliz and Conjugal Partnership Rivera-Bautista
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
ACM Palmyra CFL, LLC v. Rivera-Rodriguez et al
as 3:2014cv01750
Plaintiff:
ACM Palmyra CFL, LLC
Defendant:
Samuel Rivera-Rodriguez, Norma Velazquez-Alvarez and Conjugal Partnership Rivera-Velazquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rivera-Cuevas vs Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2011cv01295
Plaintiff:
Samuel Rivera-Cuevas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rivera-Mendez v. Puerto Rico Police Department
as 3:2010cv02025
Plaintiff:
Samuel Rivera-Mendez
Defendant:
Puerto Rico Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
RIVERA AMARO et al v. Correction and Rehabilitation Department et al
as 3:2009cv02013
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL RIVERA AMARO, ANGEL HERNANDEZ PERALES, ALFREDO MALDONADO RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant:
Correction and Rehabilitation Department and Miguel A. Pereira
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Rivera Collazo et al v. Admiral Insurance Company et al
as 3:2009cv01831
Plaintiff:
Mara Rivera Collazo, Antonio Rivera Collazo and Samuel Rivera Collazo
Defendant:
Admiral Insurance Company and Municipality of Peuelas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
