Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Rotstain et al v. Trustmark National Bank et al
as 4:2022cv09000
Defendant:
Independent Bank, Trustmark National Bank, The Toronto-Dominion Bank and others
Petitioner:
Bonnie O Habel, Daniel Gomez Ferreiro, Annalisa Mendez and others
Plaintiff:
Peggy Roif Rotstain, Guthrie Abbott, Catherine Burnell and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Official Stanford Investors Committee, Samuel Troice, Punga Punga Financial Limited and others
Interested Party:
John J Little
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Rotstain et al v. Trustmark National Bank et al
as 4:2022cv00800
Defendant:
Independent Bank, Trustmark National Bank, The Toronto-Dominion Bank and others
Petitioner:
Bonnie O Habel, Daniel Gomez Ferreiro, Annalisa Mendez and others
Plaintiff:
Peggy Roif Rotstain, Guthrie Abbott, Catherine Burnell and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Official Stanford Investors Committee, Samuel Troice, Punga Punga Financial Limited and others
Interested Party:
John J Little
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Official Stanford Invstr Com, et al v. Greenberg Traurig, L.L.P.
as 17-11464
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL TROICE, Individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, MICHOACAN TRUST, Individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated and PAM REED, Putative Class Representative
Defendant - Appellee:
GREENBERG TRAURIG, L.L.P.
Peggy Rotstain, et al v. Trustmark National Bank, et al
as 17-90038
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
GUTHRIE ABBOTT, STEVEN QUEYROUZE, SARAH ELSON-ROGERS and others
Intervenor Plaintiff - Respondent:
OFFICIAL STANFORD INVESTORS COMMITTEE, SAMUEL TROICE, PUNGA PUNGA FINANCIAL, LIMITED and others
Defendant - Respondent:
TRUSTMARK NATIONAL BANK, TORONTO-DOMINION BANK, SG PRIVATE BANKING (SUISSE) S.A. and others
Intervenor Defendant - Respondent:
BLAISE FRIEDLI
Respondent:
JOHN J. LITTLE, Court Appointed Examiner and RALPH S. JANVEY
Samuel Troice, et al v. Proskauer Rose, L.L.P., et al
as 15-10500
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SAMUEL TROICE, PUNGA PUNGA FINANCIAL, LIMITED, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated and PAM REED
Defendant - Appellant:
PROSKAUER ROSE, L.L.P., CHADBOURNE AND PARKE, LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP and THOMAS V. SJOBLOM
The Official Stanford Investors Committee et al v. Willis of Colorado, Inc. et al
as TXN/3:13-cv-03980
Receiver:
Ralph S. Janvey
Plaintiff:
The Official Stanford Investors Committee , Samuel Troice and Manuel Canabal
Defendant:
Willis of Colorado, Inc., Willis Ltd., Willis Group Holdings Ltd. and others
The Official Stanford Investors Committee et al v. Willis of Colorado, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv03980
Receiver:
Ralph S. Janvey
Plaintiff:
The Official Stanford Investors Committee , Samuel Troice and Manuel Canabal
Defendant:
Willis of Colorado, Inc., Willis Ltd., Willis Group Holdings Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
The Official Stanford Investors Committee et al v. Greenberg Traurig, LLP et al
as 3:2012cv04641
Receiver:
Ralph S. Janvey
Plaintiff:
The Official Stanford Investors Committee , Sandra Dorrell , Samuel Troice and others
Defendant:
Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Hunton & Williams LLP and Yolanda Suarez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities
Samuel Troice, et al v. Willis of Colorado Inc., et al
as 11-11048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL TROICE, PUNGA PUNGA FINANCIAL, LIMITED, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, PROMOTORA VILLA MARINO, CA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIS OF COLORADO INCORPORATED, WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITED, AMY S. BARANOUCKY and others
Appellee:
MARK DANIEL MANELA
Samuel Troice, et al v. Proskauer Rose, L.L.P., et al
as 11-11031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL TROICE, HORACIO MENDEZ, ANNALISA MENDEZ and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PROSKAUER ROSE, L.L.P., THOMAS V. SJOBLOM, P. MAURICIO ALVARADO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
