Cases 1 - 10 of 1,074
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08350
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Ortiz et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv09997
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles and Jonathan Sandoval
Plaintiff:
Chynzia Ortiz and N. R.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv02449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv09644
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv09464
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Smith v. Carlise, et al.
as 1:2024cv01317
Defendant:
Michael Sandoval, Pam, Jimmy Carlise and others
Plaintiff:
Candace Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Sandoval v. AngioDynamics, Inc. et al Case transferred electronically to Southern District of California.
as 3:2024cv01962
Defendant:
Medical Components, Inc., Angiodynamics, Inc., C.R Bard, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ai
Vasquez v. City of Oakdale, CA, et al
as 2:2024cv02867
Defendant:
Chelsi Knowles, City of Oakdale, California, Chelsie Stillwell and others
Plaintiff:
Morgan Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
