Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Irfan Shakoor Chaudry v. Heathman et al
as 4:2010mc00037
Defendant:
Sandra Heathman, Alejandro Mayorkas, Janet Napolitano and others
Plaintiff:
Irfan Shakoor Chaudry
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv03462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martinez et al v. Clinton et al
as 4:2009cv03195
Petitioner:
Marcos Guadalupe Martinez and Filia Moreno De Martinez
Respondent:
Hillary Clinton, Sandra Heathman, Michael Aytes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv03136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv03057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Puente et al v. Clinton et al
as 4:2009cv02555
Petitioner:
Pedro Munoz Puente and Juan Munoz Gonzalez
Respondent:
Hillary Clinton, Robert S Mueller, III, Sandra Heathman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv02520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv02024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Nikolla et al v. Heathman et al
as 2:2007cv11958
Plaintiff:
Nik Nikolla and Franda Nikolla
Defendant:
Sandra Heathman, Stephen J. Murphy, III, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
