Cases 1 - 10 of 208
Floyd v. Ackman et al
as 4:2024cv04068
Plaintiff:
Sebron Floyd
Defendant:
J Ackman, . Watercotte, Greg Donathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Donathan et al
as 4:2024cv04025
Plaintiff:
Allen Moore
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Erin Posey, Sandra Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11577
Plaintiff:
Sandra Simpson
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Loy v. Donathan et al
as 4:2023cv04149
Plaintiff:
John Loy
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Sharon Coleman-Deems, Sandra Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Jumper et al
as 4:2023cv04059
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sullivan
Defendant:
Shan Jumper, Gerald Carreon, Sandra Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swanson v. Scott et al
as 4:2022cv04163
Plaintiff:
John Swanson
Defendant:
Gregg Scott, Greg Donathan, Eric Kunkel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Walker v. Gregg Scott, et al
as 22-1279
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
GREGG SCOTT, Program Director, ERIK KUNKEL, DORA LUCAS, Security Therapy Aide IV and others
Clervrain et al v. Heimlich et al
as 2:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Cobbina Osei-Fosu and Brandako Inc
Defendant:
Caleb Heimlich, Olga Farnam, Marlene Pfeifer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chad Wahl v. Shan Jumper, et al
as 21-2292
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHAD WAHL
Defendant / Appellee:
SHAN JUMPER, GREGG SCOTT, EBONY BERRY and others
Snipes v. Lucas et al
as 4:2021cv04067
Defendant:
Jose Hernandez, John Doe, Brandon Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Leon Snipes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
