Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Richard Kaul v. Christopher Christie, et al
as 19-3113
Defendant:
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, GEICO CASUALTY CO, LINDY WASHBURN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE, AMERICAN SOCIETY OF INTERVENTIONAL PAIN PHYSICIANS, SCARINCI & HOLLENBECK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD ARJUN KAUL, MD
In re: Richard Kaul
as 19-2958
Not Yet Classified:
NEW JERSEY BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS, NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY, TD BANK and others
Defendant:
LINDY WASHBURN
In re: Richard Kaul
as 19-1977
Not Yet Classified:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO, NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY, CONGRESS OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS and others
Petitioner:
In re: RICHARD ARJUN KAUL, MD
Defendant:
LINDY WASHBURN
Richard Kaul v. Christopher Christie, et al
as 19-1651
Defendant:
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE, AMERICAN SOCIETY OF INTERVENTIONAL PAIN PHYSICIANS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SCARINCI & HOLLENBECK, WILLIAM MITCHELL, ROBERT HEARY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD ARJUN KAUL, MD
Navigators Ins Co v. Scarinci & Hollenbeck, et al
as 10-2724
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NAVIGATORS INS CO
Defendant - Appellant:
SCARINCI & HOLLENBECK, JOEL R. GLUCKSMAN and FRANK KAPUSINSKI
NAVIGATORS INSURANCE COMPANY v. SCARINCI & HOLLENBECK, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv04317
Plaintiff:
NAVIGATORS INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
SCARINCI & HOLLENBECK, LLC, JOEL GLUCKSMAN and FRANK KAPUSINSKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
CITY OF UNION CITY v. ZAYAS et al
as 2:2007cv01362
Plaintiff:
CITY OF UNION CITY
Defendant:
LOUIS A. ZAYAS, EDWIN OSORIO, BRIAN STACK and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
SCARINCI & HOLLENBECK, ESQS., BRIAN STACK, DONALD SCARINCI and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
LOUIS A. ZAYAS and EDWIN OSORIO
Counter Claimant:
LOUIS A. ZAYAS and EDWIN OSORIO
Counter Defendant:
Robert Levy, SCARINCI & HOLLENBECK, ESQS., DONALD SCARINCI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
