Cases 1 - 7 of 7
STATE OF INDIANA EX REL ROKITA v. JACKSON COUNTY SCHNECK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL D/B/A SCHNECK MEDICAL CENTER
as 4:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
STATE OF INDIANA EX REL ROKITA
Defendant:
JACKSON COUNTY SCHNECK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL D/B/A SCHNECK MEDICAL CENTER
Ascension Borgess Hospital, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 21-5246
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ascension Borgess Hospital, Ascension Sacred Heart Hospital Pensacola, Ascension SE Wisconsin Hospital-St. Joseph Campus and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Rush Copley Memorial Hospital, 20-cv-01957, Rush Oak Park Hospital, Inc., 20-cv-01957 and Rush University Medical Center, 20-cv-01957
Defendant / Appellee:
Xavier Becerra, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
ATHENS-LIMESTONE HOSPITAL et al v. AZAR II
as 1:2020cv00230
Plaintiff:
DALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT, UMASS MEMORIAL HEALTHALLIANCE - CLINTON HOSPITAL - LEOMINSTER CAMPUS, LENOX HILL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR II and ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ASCENSION BORGESS HOSPITAL et al v. AZAR
as 1:2020cv00139
Plaintiff:
INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH BALL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, BRYAN MEDICAL CENTER - EAST CAMPUS, IU HEALTH NORTH HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ANDALUSIA HEALTH et al v. AZAR, II
as 1:2018cv01756
Plaintiff:
KING'S DAUGHTERS' HOSPITAL & HEALTH SERVICES, CENTEGRA HOSPITAL - WOODSTOCK, BRYAN MEDICAL CENTER - EAST CAMPUS and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
APPLETON MEDICAL CENTER et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2010cv01498
Plaintiff:
APPLETON MEDICAL CENTER , ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL, INC. , BALL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
