Cases 1 - 10 of 523
Lawrence v. St. Lawrence County Correctional Facility Sheriff's Office et al
as 8:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lawrence
Defendant:
Detective Shattick, St. Lawrence County Correctional Facility Sheriff's Office, Deputy Yerdon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kirkham v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv00644
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Kirkham, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lewis v. Town of Elizabethtown
as 8:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Scott Phillip Lewis
Defendant:
Town of Elizabethtown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Gerken v. Gordon et al
as 1:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Daniel-Lee Gerken
Defendant:
Thomas Gordon, Erin Scott, Rensselaer County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Suppes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Scott Raymond Suppes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ferrara et al v. United Auto Supply of Syracuse, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ferrara, Scott Johnson and Michael Trinca
Defendant:
United Auto Supply of Syracuse, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Whitaker v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Scott Whitaker
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
