Cases 31 - 40 of 1,281
Haar v. Moates et al
as 1:2023cv01309
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Haar
Defendant:
Scott Moates, J Frank and L Drinkard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dangerfield v. Rees et al
as 1:2023cv01296
Plaintiff:
Amantae Dangerfield
Defendant:
Karen Norman Rees, Illinois River's Penitentiary, Kellie Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Thompson et al
as 3:2023cv02430
Plaintiff:
DeMarius Walker
Defendant:
Christopher Scott Thompson, Mr Long and Centralia C.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Redman v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv04529
Petitioner:
Scott C Redman
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Scott v. Davis
as 1:2023cv03586
Plaintiff:
Shawn Scott
Defendant:
Anthony Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goings v. Nodine et al
as 1:2023cv03036
Plaintiff:
Frederick Goings
Defendant:
Scott S. Nodine, T. Woodcock, John Does 1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carswell v. People of the State of Illinois, The et al
as 1:2023cv02711
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Scott Carswell
Defendant:
People of the State of Illinois, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Thompson et al
as 3:2023cv01466
Plaintiff:
DeMarius Walker
Defendant:
Christopher Scott Thompson and Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Wills et al
as 1:2023cv02562
Petitioner:
James Scott
Respondent:
Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fonville v. Campbell et al
as 3:2023cv03105
Plaintiff:
Michael Fonville
Defendant:
Jack Campbell, Larry Beck, Bill Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
