Cases 11 - 20 of 393
The State of Georgia v. Nettles
as 2:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
The State of Georgia
Defendant:
Brian-Scott Nettles
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05587
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (religion)
Caudle v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv05241
Plaintiff:
Allen Okechukwu Caudle
Defendant:
United States of America, Dept State Secretary Antony Blinken, Scott Berrier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
KJ v. Rockdale County Public Schools et al
as 1:2023cv04370
Plaintiff:
KJ
Defendant:
Rockdale County Public Schools, Christopher Swann, Kathy Mewborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Redman v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv04287
Plaintiff:
Ronald Scott Redman
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, The Federal Bureau of Investigation and The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0983 Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 (CAFRA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
JOHNSON v. FACEBOOK et al
as 1:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W JOHNSON
Defendant:
FACEBOOK, META, RUDY GULIANNI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Wade et al v. Morgan et al
as 3:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Betty Wade and David Jacob Henegar
Defendant:
Keambriah Morgan, Jessica Blount, Tamara Grier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
