Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Hartsfield v. United States Army
as 3:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Hartsfield
Defendant:
United States Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Scott v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Shelia R. Scott
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Miller El v. Ward et al
as 7:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller El
Defendant:
Jacqueline F. Talevi, Scott R. Geddes, James R. Swanson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Scott v. Accordius Health at Lynchburg, LLC et al
as 6:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Scott
Defendant:
Accordius Health at Lynchburg, LLC and Accordius Health, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Robinson v. 7-Eleven, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00627
Plaintiff:
Joyce Robinson
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc., Lilah K. Scott, Inc. and April Benge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Lloyd v. Shairan
as 1:2023cv01285
Plaintiff:
Scott F Lloyd and Lloyd F. Scott
Defendant:
Aseel Saleeh Shairan and Aseel Saleeh Saeed Shairan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury/ Motor Vehicle
Andakhayeva v. Winners Freight, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Moldir Andakhayeva
Defendant:
Winners Freight, LLC and Christopher Scott Sherlock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Scott v. Kroger Limited Partnership I
as 1:2023cv00582
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Scott
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Scott v. Kroger Limited Partnership I
as 3:2023cv00321
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Scott
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Sabbakhan v. City of Richmond, et al.
as 3:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Khalah Sabbakhan
Defendant:
City Of Richmond, P.B. Campbell, Scott Land and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
