Cases 1 - 10 of 11
YOUNG v. ICREDITWORKS INC. et al
as 2:2024cv02122
Plaintiff:
SCOTT YOUNG
Defendant:
ICREDITWORKS INC. and STEPHEN SWEENEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
YOUNG et al v. SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00737
Plaintiff:
SCOTT YOUNG and WANDA YOUNG
Defendant:
SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE SOUTHEAST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract
CHARTER HOMES BUILDING COMPANY et al v. CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 5:2022cv05199
Plaintiff:
CHARTER HOMES BUILDING COMPANY and CHARTER HOMES AT MILL CREEK, INC.
Defendant:
CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, CHARLAN GROUP, L.P., MILL CREEK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
CHARTER HOMES BUILDING COMPANY et al v. CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv05199
Plaintiff:
CHARTER HOMES BUILDING COMPANY and CHARTER HOMES AT MILL CREEK, INC.
Defendant:
CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, CHARLAN GROUP, L.P., MILL CREEK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
SHERMAN v. YOUNG
as 1:2019cv07646
Petitioner:
FRANCIS D. SHERMAN
Respondent:
WARDEN SCOTT YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FATIGA v. YOUNG
as 1:2019cv01934
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS FATIGA
Respondent:
SCOTT YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MONTGOMERY v. YOUNG
as 1:2018cv17529
Respondent:
SCOTT YOUNG
Petitioner:
RICHARD MONTGOMERY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ORTIZ v. YOUNG
as 1:2018cv14665
Petitioner:
CARLOS ORTIZ
Respondent:
WARDEN SCOTT YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
STRICKLAND v. YOUNG
as 1:2018cv11820
Petitioner:
CORTEZ STRICKLAND
Respondent:
WARDEN SCOTT YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
STRICTLAND v. YOUNG
as 1:2018cv08983
Petitioner:
CORTEZ STRICTLAND
Respondent:
SCOTT YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
