Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Lamonte, Jr. v. Pierce et al
as 1:2023cv00124
Plaintiff: Charlie Lamonte McKinney, Jr. and Al-Kareem-Khalil
Defendant: Special Agent Matthew Pierce, G.D.C. Criminal Investigation Division, G.D.C. Office of Professional Standards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LYONS v. EMMONS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00165
Petitioner: SCOTT LYONS
Respondent: WARDEN SEAN EMMONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lyons v. Emmons
as 4:2023cv00095
Petitioner: Scott Lyons
Respondent: Sean Emmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MORGAN v. DOZIER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2021cv00164
Plaintiff: ANTONIO LAMAR MORGAN
Defendant: GREGORY C DOZIER, CHRISTOPHER CARR, MICHAEL BARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Emmons
as 1:2021cv05076
Petitioner: Kiel Dion Jones
Respondent: Warden Sean Emmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCKINNEY v. EMMONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2020cv00072
Defendant: GDC CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION DIVISION, IVY, WARDEN SEAN EMMONS and others
Plaintiff: CHARLIE LAMONTE MCKINNEY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKINNEY v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2020cv00005
Defendant: WARDEN SEAN EMMONS, SPECIAL AGENT PORTER and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff: CHARLIE LAMONTE MCKINNEY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tanner v. Emmons
as 1:2019cv01959
Petitioner: Dewayne David Tanner
Respondent: Warden Sean Emmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tanner v. Emmons
as 4:2019cv00086
Petitioner: Dewayne David Tanner
Respondent: Warden Sean Emmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. EMMONS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv00081
Petitioner: Jeremy Antwun Smith
Respondent: SEAN EMMONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?