Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Dietl et al v. Sears Roebuck and Co., et al
as 4:2018cv02186
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co. and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Robert Dietl and James Dietl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Dinsio v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 5:2016cv00388
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Plaintiff:
Bert Dinsio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Grynko v. Sears Roebuck and Co.
as 1:2014cv02385
Petitioner:
Aurika A. Grynko
Respondent:
Sears Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Eric Johnson, Inc. et al v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. et al
as 1:2013cv02305
Plaintiff:
Eric Johnson, Inc. , Eric Johnson , Rhonda Johnson and others
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co. , Sears Holding Corporation , LG Electronics USA, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
LG Electronics Inc. Tianjin Appliance Co., Ltd and LG Electronics USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Faeth v. Diversified Maintenance Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00792
Plaintiff:
Mary Faeth
Defendant:
Diversified Maintenance Systems, Inc., Sears, Roebuck and Co. , Sears Holdings Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cross_defendant:
Diversified Maintenance Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Lopez v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 1:2012cv00415
Plaintiff:
Marie T. Lopez
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
