Cases 1 - 6 of 6
State of Tennessee v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 24-5220
Plaintiff:
STATE OF TENNESSEE
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, JESSICA S. MARCELLA, in her official capacity as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
Therese Waters v. HHS
as 22-1997
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THERESE M. WATERS, obo Kelly E. Waters
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, named as Norris Cochran, acting Secretary of Health & Human Services
Livingston Educational Service Agency, et al v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 22-1257
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LIVINGSTON EDUCATIONAL SERVICE AGENCY and WAYNE-WESTLAND COMMUNITY SCHOOLS
Defendant / Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, JOO YEUN CHANG, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary and Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Administration for Children and Families and others
Waters v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
as 1:2021cv00170
Defendant:
Secretary of Heath & Human Services, Secretary of Health and Human Services and U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Therese M. Waters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Owensboro Health, Inc. v. HHS, et al
as 16-6530
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWENSBORO HEALTH, INC., Medicare Provider No. 18-0038
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Woodfill v. Secretary of Health and Human Service et al
as 3:2011cv02236
Plaintiff:
Mary K. Woodfill
Defendant:
Secretary of Health and Human Services and Humana Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
