Cases 1 - 10 of 32
PRUITT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv04772
Plaintiff:
LEROY PRUITT
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, FORMER DISTRICT OF PHILA. SETH WILLIAMS SUB NOM, LARRY KRASHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EL v. WOLF et al
as 2:2021cv02520
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, JIYA RABEVETSKY, GOEHRING, RUTTER, AND BOEHM and others
Plaintiff:
DELILAH PASSE EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SUTTON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv01300
Defendant:
ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY JENNIFER LEONARDIS, OFFICER REGINALD GRAHAM, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff:
ANDRE SUTTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brett v. (unreadable) et al
as 1:2019cv01161
Defendant:
Mike McGloal, Dermont Fishman, Robert Rochwell and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BYRD v. MANGOLD et al
as 2:2019cv00504
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER GREGORY GILLESPIE, KATHLEEN KANE, SPECIAL AGENT PATRICK MANGOLD and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD BYRD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALBERT v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2018cv05114
Defendant:
RUFUS SETH WILLIAMS, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRETT v. BIDEN et al
as 2:2018cv04738
Defendant:
MONSIGNOR LYNN, BARRY KNIGHT, KEN BRETT and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SPEARMAN v. SOTELLO et al
as 2:2018cv02595
Plaintiff:
MELVIN SPEARMAN
Defendant:
ANGELIQUE SOTELLO, ALONZO DAWSON, MELANIE BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRETT v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2017cv03314
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
SETH WILLIAMS, CAPE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER "THE BOSS, DAVID SAMSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FULLMAN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv02673
Plaintiff:
ANDREW FULLMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
