Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Sizyuk v. Purdue University et al
as 4:2020cv00075
Defendant:
PURDUE UNIVERSITY and the BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY, SEUNGJIN KIM, MAMORU ISHII and others
Plaintiff:
TATYANA SIZYUK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
KIM v. WATCH TOWER BIBLE &TRACT SOCIETY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2018cv00609
Plaintiff:
SEUNGJIN KIM
Defendant:
WATCH TOWER BIBLE &TRACT SOCIETY OF PENNSYLVANIA, WATCH TOWER BIBLE &TRACT SOCIETY OF NEW YORK, INC., CHRISTIAN CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Seungjin Kim v. President of the U.S., et al
as 16-5331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Seungjin Kim
Defendant - Appellee:
President of the United States of America, Attorney General of the United States, Secretary of State and others
KIM v. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2016cv02002
Plaintiff:
SEUNGJIN KIM
Defendant:
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, SECRETARY OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
KIM v. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
as 1:2016cv00095
Plaintiff:
SEUNGJIN KIM
Defendant:
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Seungjin Kim v. Google, Inc.
as 14-7107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Seungjin Kim
Defendant - Appellee:
Google, Inc.
Seungjin Kim v. Watch Tower Bible and Tract So
as 14-7102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Seungjin Kim
Defendant - Appellee:
Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-7101
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
KIM v. WATCH TOWER BIBLE AND TRACT SOCIETY OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 1:2014cv01126
Plaintiff:
SEUNGJIN KIM
Defendant:
WATCH TOWER BIBLE AND TRACT SOCIETY OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
