Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Lovette v. Jones
as 2:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jeffel Lovette
Defendant:
Sgt. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Littlejohn v. William et al
as 1:2023cv02953
Plaintiff:
Timothy Littlejohn
Defendant:
Colonel William, Colonel Atkins, CtL. Wessenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Littlejohn v. Shoultz et al
as 1:2023cv02659
Plaintiff:
Timothy Littlejohn
Defendant:
Deputy Shoultz, Boyette, Craig Oupno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. Dillman et al
as 2:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Byron Donnelle Clay
Defendant:
Dr. S. Dillman, T. J. Kidder, Sgt. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jahid v. Owens et al
as 1:2023cv00551
Plaintiff:
Nasir A. Jahid and Eric K. Payne
Defendant:
Craig Owens, Rhonda Anderson, Classifications Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jahid v. Owens et al
as 1:2023cv00552
Plaintiff:
Nasir A. Jahid and Eric Payne
Defendant:
Craig Owens, Sgt. Jones, Rhonda Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Littlejohn et al v. William et al
as 1:2023mi00002
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dewayne Littlejohn and Jerome Bell
Defendant:
Colonel William, Craig Owens, Chief Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Littlejohn v. Jones et al
as 1:2021cv04284
Plaintiff:
Timothy Littlejohn
Defendant:
Sgt. Jones, Sgt. Stevens, Wellpath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Littlejohn v. Atkins et al
as 1:2021cv03693
Plaintiff:
Timothy Littlejohn
Defendant:
Colonel Atkins, Commander Wessenberger, Mjr Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Littlejohn v. Baines et al
as 1:2021cv03172
Plaintiff:
Timothy Littlejohn
Defendant:
Major Baines, Sgt. Ellison, Ctl. Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
