Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv04331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
In re: Wm. Plouffe, Jr.
as 12-3848
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: WM. C. PLOUFFE, JR.
Defendant - Respondent:
F. JAVIER CEVALLOS, President of Kutztown Unitversity of Pennsylvania, as employee, officer, supervisor and/or policymaker in his individual and official capacities, SHARON PICUS, Executive Director of Human Resources of Kutztown University of Pennsylvania, as employee, officer, supervisor and/or policymaker in her individual and official capacities, ALEXANDER PISCIOTTA, Chair and Professor, Criminal Justice Department of Kutztown University of Pennsylvania, as employee, officer, supervisor and/or policymaker in her individual and official capacities and others
Garnishee - Respondent:
ANNE ZAYAITZ, Dean of the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences of Kutztown University Pennsylvania, as employee, officer, supervisor and/or policymaker in her individual capacities
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN
In re: Wm. Plouffe, Jr.
as 12-2982
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: WM. C. PLOUFFE, JR., IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY AND AS A PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Defendant:
F. JAVIER CEVALLOS, PRESIDENT OF KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, AS EMPLOYEE, OFFICER, SUPERVISOR, AND/OR POLICYMAKER IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES, ANNE ZAYAITZ, DEAN OF THE COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS AND SCIENCES OF KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, AS EMPLOYEE, OFFICER, SUPERVISOR, AND/OR POLICYMAKER IN HER INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITIES, SHARON PICUS, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES OF KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, AS EMPLOYEE, OFFICER, SUPERVISOR, AND/OR POLCY MAKER IN HER INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITIES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv01502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
