Cases 1 - 10 of 35
LASSITER v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2022cv02567
Plaintiff:
DUSKIN CORBAN LASSITER
Defendant:
TODD YOUNG, JOHN BARRASSO, MARSH BLACKBURN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MAVERICK GAMING LLC v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
MAVERICK GAMING LLC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ABBOTT v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2021cv02492
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R. ABBOTT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, SHELLEY POWER, LORETTA OTIS-SANDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LIPTON v. THE DAILY CALLER, INC.
as 1:2021cv01901
Plaintiff:
SHELLEY LIPTON
Defendant:
DAILY CALLER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Scott Sattler v. DOJ, et al
as 20-5246
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, Rebecca B. Bond, Michael L. Alston and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Scott Sattler
Michael Owl Feather-Gorbey v. Anthony Shelley, et al
as 20-5166
Defendant / Appellee:
Marry Lue Soller, Lead-Supervisory Attorney, United States of America, Kathleen Therese Wach, Pro-bono Attorney and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
OWL FEATHER-GORBEY v. SHELLEY et al
as 1:2020cv01355
Defendant:
KATHLEEN WACH, UNITED STATES, ANTHONY F. SHELLEY and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. OWL FEATHER-GORBEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00867
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
RISENHOOVER v. LAW OFFICES OF NEIL HARE et al
as 1:2019cv03511
Defendant:
SHELLEY HYMES, JULIAN LIN, LISA COLANGELO and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL MAAS RISENHOOVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
